Search This Blog

Be a Member of this BLOG

Mar 22, 2011

The Duchess of Malfi: A Revenge Play

The earliest writer of the tragedy in English language, Thomas Sackville and Thomas Norton, fastened on a story of revenge for their Gorboduc, which first produce in 1561. Since than for next sixty years revenge continued to be one of the popular theme for the dramatic representation and it is pointed out that Webster’s The Duchess of Malfi is a revenge play. We shall analyze this line of argument with the help of Senecan Model--a model for the revenge tragedy.

In a tragedy, as Senecan model defines, “a shocking murder takes place and it cries out for their revenge”. In The Duchess of Malfi, the Aragonian Brothers, Ferdinand and the Cardinal, takes their revenge on the Duchess for remarrying to her steward against their wishes, but the Duchess’ marriage is not a crime. The wicked brothers have no motive except the wounded family name. The sympathy of the audience remains throughout the Duchess who is the target of her brother’s revenge. The brothers’ resentiment at their sister’s second marriage infuriatates them so such an extent that they become inhuman and hired an instrument, Bosola, to kill her. After her murder Ferdinand confesses: “What was meanness of her match to me? I can confess, I had a hope Had she continued window, to have gain’d An infinite mass of treasure, by her death”.
But the Machiavellian of the brothers, the Cardinal does not makes such any confession but the motive was same as Ferdinand’s. As the “motive” appears to be avarice not revenge.

In revenge tragedy “the objects of the murder are often better are so called avengers”. When Ferdinand refuses to pay Bosola, the latter realizes his guilt, he becomes avenger and he decides to works as an avenger for the murder of the Duchess. The revenge is again twisted, when Bosola, the instrument takes his revenge upon the Cardinal for being ungrateful to him. In this sense The Duchess of Malfi is a revenge play.

According to Senecan model, “in a revenge tragedy, the murder of the ghost stalks about and asks for his revenge ……… alternatively there are omens presentiments”. In The Duchess of Malfi, like Shakespeare, Webster tries to make the spirit of his dead protagonist. All the villains--Ferdinand, the Cardinal, Bosola and even the hero, Antonio--are haunted by the spirit of the dead Duchess. Bosola confesses that he sees an image of the Duchess. Then there is omen of the “echo” scene which warns Antonio of the imminent death if he goes to the Cardinal’s palace. Finally, everyone who meets his death in Act V is dies in the remembering of the Duchess.

In a tragedy “some character becomes mad”. Here it is Ferdinand who becomes mad. He confesses that he is haunted by the spirit of the Duchess. In his madness he tries to throttle his own shadow and cries “strangling is a cruel death”. He taunted the Duchess with the words “The howling of a wolf Is music to thy”. In his Lycanthropia--wolf madness--he goes howling along with the streets till he makes all the villains restless.

In The Duchess of Malfi Webster makes use of “pathos” known for tragedy writers. According to Aristotle “Pity and Fear” are the two tragic emotions and the play arouses both of them quite abundantly. The most memorable lines of the drama is one steeped in stark of pathos which Ferdinand utters in a fit of remorse after looking at the face of his sister: “Cover’t her face my eyes dazzle she died young”. These lines confirm Ferdinand as a jealous lover of his sister that is why he pays to Bosola so that he can closely spy on the Duchess and on her activities. F.L. Lucas has pointed out that these “lines shows Ferdinand’s lust for his own sister”. M. Burman remarks that “The play is a drama about the relationship between brother and sister”. Thus, The Duchess of Malfi has all the features of Senecan model of tragedy.

A further point, in which Webster scores overall, from all the tragedy writers of the day, is his moral vision. Webster’s good characters always win our administration and sympathy. Act V which is always criticizes for providing a kind of anti-climax is founded necessary by Webster to project his moral vision. We cannot leave theatre or play frustrated. We have a sense of reconciliation--as we do, when we get the end of a Shakespeare tragedy--when Delio observes at the end “Let us make a noble use of this great ruin and join our hands to establishes this young hopeful gentleman in his mother’s pride, we feel like saying “Amen”.

In sum, no doubt, in The Duchess of Malfi revenge plays a part of its own but Webster’s tone of moral makes it degrade from the original supremacy. In this play revenge is a nominal thing--it is all slight as compared to The White Devil. Webster makes revenge not on an objectionate love affair but presents it with a moral. One may put forward the point; by introducing the tone of moral justice at the end Webster raises the crude theme of revenge to a higher plane. It shows that Webster not absolutely lost in blood and revenge like the other tragedy writers of the day--he raises above them and shakes hands with Shakespeare in attaining the higher heights of a tragedy.

5 comments:

  1. thanx a lot..but v r unable to copy n get a print.. :(

    ReplyDelete
  2. Supernatural area is dubious and I can challenge u about it. Its rather different from what you wrote. Its not ghosts appearing but the people are thinking about it. Its 'psychological' and not 'real'. I don't think you should post this in such a Callous Manner.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Supernatural area is dubious and I can challenge u about it. Its rather different from what you wrote. Its not ghosts appearing but the people are thinking about it. Its 'psychological' and not 'real'. I don't think you should post this in such a Callous Manner.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There is always a controversy regarding the presence of supernaturals.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

All Posts

A Fine Balance A House for Mr. Biswas Absurd Drama Achebe Across the Black Waters Addison Adiga African Ages Albee Alberuni Ambedkar American Amrita Pritam Anand Anatomy of Criticism Anglo Norman Anglo Saxon Aristotle Ariyar Arnold Ars Poetica Auden Augustan Aurobindo Ghosh Backett Bacon Badiou Bardsley Barthes Baudelaire Beckeley Bejnamin Belinda Webb Bellow Beowulf Bhabha Bharatmuni Bhatnagar Bijay Kant Dubey Blake Bloomsbury Book Bookchin Booker Prize bowen Braine British Brooks Browne Browning Buck Burke CA Duffy Camus Canada Chaos Characters Charlotte Bronte Chaucer Chaucer Age China Chomsky Coetzee Coleridge Conard Contact Cornelia Sorabji Critical Essays Critics and Books Cultural Materialism Culture Dalit Lliterature Daruwalla Darwin Dattani Death of the Author Deconstruction Deridda Derrida Desai Desani Dickens Dilip Chitre Doctorow Donne Dostoevsky Dryden EB Browning Ecology Edmund Wilson Eliot Elizabethan Ellison Emile Emily Bronte English Epitaph essats Essays Esslin Ethics Eugene Ionesco Existentialism Ezekiel Faiz Fanon Farrel Faulkner Feminism Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness Ferber Fitzgerald Foregrounding Formalist Approach Forster Foucault Frankfurt School French Freud Frost Frye Fyre Gandhi Gender German Germany Ghosh Gilbert Adair Golding Gordimer Greek Gulliver’s Travels Gunjar Halliday Hard Times Hardy Hawthorne Hemingway Heyse Hindi Literature Historical Materialism History Homer Horace Hunt Huxley Ibsen In Memoriam India Indian. Gadar Indra Sinha Interview Ireland Irish Jack London Jane Eyre Japan JM Synge Johnson Joyce Joyce on Criticism Jumpa Lahiri Jussawalla Kafka Kalam Kalidasa Kamla Das Karnard Keats Kipling Langston Hughes Language Language of Paradox Larkin Le Clezio Lenin Lessing Levine Life of PI literary Criticism Luckas Lucretius Lyrical Ballads Macaulay Magazines Mahapatra Mahima Nanda Malory Mandeville Manto Manusmrti Mao Marlowe Martel Martin Amis Marx Marxism Mary Shelley Maugham McCarry Medi Media Miller Milton Moby Dick Modern Mona Loy Morrison Movies Mulk Raj Anand Mytth of Sisyphus Nabokov Nahal Naipaul Narayan Natyashastra Neo-Liberalism NET New Criticism new historicism News Nietzsche Nikita Lalwani Niyati Pathak Niyati Pathank Nobel Prize O Henry Of Studies Ondaatje Orientalism Orwell Pakistan Pamela Paradise Lost Pater Pinter Poems Poetics Poets Pope Post Feminism Post Modern Post Structuralism post-Colonialism Poststructuralism Preface to Shakespeare Present Prize Psycho Analysis Psychology and Form Publish Pulitzer Prize Puritan PWA Radio Ramayana Rape of the Lock Renaissance Restoration Revival Richardson Rime of Ancient Mariner RL Stevenson Rohinton Mistry Romantic Roth Rousseau Rushdie Russia Russian Formalism Sartre Sashi Despandey Satan Sati Savitri Seamus Heaney’ Shakespeare Shaw Shelley Shiv K.Kumar Showalter Sibte Hasan Slavery Slow Man Socialism Spender Spenser Sri Lanka Stage of Development Steinbeck Stories Subaltern Sufis Surrealism Swift Tagore Tamil Literature Ted Hughes Tennyson Tennyson. Victorian Terms Tess of the D’Urbervilles The March The Metamorphsis The Order of Discourse The Outsider The Playboy of the Western World The Politics The Satanic Verses The Scarlet Letter The Transitional Poets The Waste Land The Work of Art In The Age of Mechanical Reproduction The Wuthering Heights Theatre of Absurd Theory Theory of Criticism Theory of Evolution Theory of Literature Thomas McEvilley Thoreau To the Lighthouse Tolstoy Touchstone Method Tughlaq Tulsi Badrinath Twain Two Uses of Language UGC-NET Ulysses Untouchable Urdu Victorian Vijay Tendulkar Vikram Seth Vivekananda Voltaire Voyage To Modernity Walter Tevis Webster Wellek West Indies Wharton Williams WJ Long Woolfe Wordsworth World Wars Writers WW-I WW-II Wycliff Xingjian Yeats Zadie Smith Zaheer Zizek Zoe Haller