The Nobel
Laureate of 2001, Naipaul’s view of art reminds one of Carlyle’s perception o
the writer as a kind of secular-clergy as Ian Baruma suggests. A House for
Mr. Biswas, “The marked signature of failure” of hero is the story of Naipaul’s
father Seeparsed, leads one to the disquieting realization:
When everybody wants to fight, there’s nothing to fight
for. Everybody wants to fight his own little war, everybody is a guerrilla.
The hero was
born at he inauspicious midnight hour, like Salim Sinai in The Midnight’s
Children, as the narrator describes Mr. Biswas:
Malnutrition gave him the shallowest of chests, the
thinnest of limbs; it stunned his growth and gave him a soft rising belley. And
thus, perceptibly, he grew.
Mr. Biswas “the
barking puppy dog” was a hero lacking in heroism but has been talked about as
if he were heroic, and has been described passing “his tongue above his upper
lip to make it tough the knobby tip of his nose,” then he is shown, “spitting
carefully, trying to let his spittle hand down to the floor without breaking
it.”
The theme of
individual fulfillment and of the crumbling of the society comes together. The
novel is set against the background of the socio-political changes in Trinidad
during the Second World War when England had leased to the American forces its
military based in Carribbean. The search for self on the part of Mr. Biswas
began as early as he developed a consciousness of the world around him. At
Pegotes, living in a one-room tenement with his mother, Bipti, at Bhandat’s
sharing a room with his rowdy sons—Rabidat and Jagdat, at Pandit
Jairam’s—wherever he is “before the Tulsis,” he has been shown greatly
concerned with his identity and his role in life. For him
It is far more difficult to sever relationship between
the old and new or the past and the present, than a simple desire to do so may
imply.
The most
significant trait of Mr. Biswas is his rebelliousness at the moment he realizes
that he is trapped into Hanuman House “a blasrws zoo” by Tulsi Family “this
blasted fowl run”. He called Shama’s, his wife, brother are called “the little
gods,” Seth as “the big Boss”, Mrs. Tulsi as “Old Queen,” “The Old Hen”, “A
she-fox” and son on.
Mr. Bsiwas is
so firmly ensconced in Tulsidom that it is only Deu ex Machina, i.e., divine
intervention or the role of chance that finally succeeds in wearing him away
from it. It was chance that he revealed to him his gift for painting letters in
Mr. Lal’s classroom. It was chance which made him write a note of love to Shama
under the provocation of Jagdat and Rabidat, which ultimately landed him in
Hanuman House. All in all, Mr. Biswas, the failed Pandit, is not a wholly
admirable character.
Mr. Biswas “was
struck again and again by the wonder of being in his own house, the audacity of
it” but he failed to make it. He wanted to forget “The memories of Hanuman
House, The Chase, Green Vale, Shorthills, the Tulsi in Port of Spain would
become jumbled, blurred; events would be telescoped, many forgotten.” At the
end, he found himself in his own house, even though he has had a heart attack
and he is on rather frail health, he would not mind dying in his own house:
How terrible it would have been …. To have died among the
Tulsis …. Worse to have lived without even attempting to lay claim to one’s
portion of the earth.”
The impression
left is undeniably of the futility of the whole endeavor. Shelly’s Ozymandias
like, Mr. Biswas fretted and fumed all his life for something which could not
outlast. The last sentence of the novel runs:
“Afterwards the sisters returned to their respective
homes and Shama and the children went back in the perfect to the Empty house.”
Here the house
rendered “empty” after Mr. Biswas’s death at the age of 46.
One can perhaps
conclude by suggesting that as regards the portrayal of the lives and
activities of the immigrant Hindus in Trinidad, it can be averred that A
House for Mr. Biswas anticipates Naipaul’s triology on India—India: A
Wounded Civilization (1964); India” An Area of Darkness (1977) and India:
A Million Mutinies Now (1990).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.